Member, Hangzhou Municipal Criminal Compliance Professional Committee Member, Hangzhou Gongshu District Criminal Committee

Criminal Cases: 1. Wang's Case (Gambling): Xiaoshan Court changed the verdict to gambling instead of opening a gambling house. 2. Shao's Case (Drug Trafficking): In 2013, the court argued that the legal facts of this case were not applicable to the "Court's Review of Narcotics" based on the legislative purpose and legal reasoning. This view was adopted in the 2022 judicial interpretation of drug crimes. 3. Jiang's Case (Fraud): After communicating with the special task force, Beijing Haidian Public Security first released on bail and then dropped the case. 4. Hu's Case (Participation in a Black Society Organization): After multiple communications and meetings with the Shangcheng Procuratorate and Court, a sentencing agreement was signed (the first such agreement in Hangzhou for black society organization cases). This resulted in the lightest sentence for the same crime, similar circumstances, and same region. 5. Fang's Case (Dangerous Driving): By combining on-site photos, measurements, GPS maps, and on-site law enforcement videos, the police record, Fang's multiple confessions regarding the driving distance, and malicious circumstances were overturned, and mitigating circumstances were legally obtained. 6. Ma's Case (Sale of Counterfeit Registered Trademarked Goods): Anji Court verdict: No penalty. 7. Ma's Case (Illegal Possession of Guns and Ammunition): Hangzhou Municipal Procuratorate did not approve the arrest, and the Municipal Public Security withdrew the case. 8. Wu's Case (Bribery): The amount of bribery was significantly reduced. 9. Cao's Case (Illegal Business Operations): After the Shangyu Procuratorate in Shaoxing did not approve the arrest, a probation agreement was signed, and the court sentenced him to probation. 10. Ni's Case (Illegal Fundraising): (First defendant, vice president) In the Yuhang Court trial, through court investigation, the details of evidence provided by 8 defendants and the public prosecutor overturned half of the accusations in the indictment, resulting in the same sentence as the second defendant (department manager). 11. He's Case (Mass Brawl): A probation agreement was signed before the trial, and the Xihu Court sentenced him to probation. 12. Fu's Case (Fundraising Fraud): Three days before the Yangzhou Guangling Procuratorate transferred the case to the court (sentence of more than 10 years), the case was accepted. After reviewing the case file, urgent communication with the procuratorate resulted in the procuratorate delaying the transfer, reopening the procuratorial committee, changing the charge to illegal fundraising, signing a probation agreement for 4 years, and persuading the court to change the sentence to 3.5 years based on a positive attitude towards returning stolen goods (which was not actually achieved). 13. Chen's Case (Coercion): Binjiang Procuratorate did not approve the arrest, and the Public Security withdrew the case; Zhang's Case (Fraud): Binjiang Procuratorate had disagreements regarding the sexual fraud, and after requesting instructions from the Intermediate Court, all 5 people involved were not arrested, and the Public Security withdrew the case. 14. Liu's Case (Sale of Counterfeit Registered Trademarked Goods): Jianggan Procuratorate did not approve the arrest, and the court sentenced him to probation; Wang's Case (Sale of Counterfeit Drugs): Jianggan Procuratorate did not approve the arrest, and the Public Security withdrew the case. 15. Jin's Case (Gambling): Yuhang Procuratorate did not approve the arrest and then did not prosecute; Shen's Case (Fire Safety Responsibility Accident): Yuhang Procuratorate did not approve the arrest, and the court sentenced him to probation; Zhu's Case (Gambling): Yuhang Procuratorate did not approve the arrest and then did not prosecute; Xiao's Case (Fraud): Yuhang Procuratorate did not approve the arrest, and the Public Security withdrew the case; Zhang's Case (Production and Sale of Food that Does Not Meet Safety Standards): Yuhang Procuratorate did not approve the arrest, and the Public Security withdrew the case. Commercial Cases: Zhejiang Ruixin Financial Services Outsourcing Co., Ltd. was sued by Luo Jian and Jin Lijie for contract disputes: Jianggan Court overturned the general presumption that the authenticity of a seal implies the authenticity of the act of a